雅思寫作分值對照表
雅思寫作分數對照表爲大家帶來雅思寫作分數和託福的換算和對照表。雅思寫作分數對照表是什麼?雅思寫作分數對照表就是將雅思寫作的分數換算成其他考試或等級的分數時用來參照的標準。對於這個標準，雅思官方曾經出過一版和託福之間的對照，下文就是雅思託福的分數對照表。
雅思寫作分值對照表
雅思寫作評分標準
1、雅思寫作任務完成情況與迴應情況
2、雅思寫作語法多樣性
3、雅思寫作連貫與銜接
4、雅思寫作詞彙豐富程度
雅思和託福的寫作分數換算
IELTS Score TOEFL Score
雅思寫作 託福寫作
9.0 30
8.5 30
8.0 30
7.5 29
7.0 27-28
6.5 24-26
6.0 21-23
5.5 18-20
5.0 14-17
4.5 12-13
<=4.0 0-11
聽說讀寫：四項總分
IELTS Score TOEFL Score
9.0 118-120
8.5 115-117
8.0 110-114
7.5 102-109
7.0 94-101
6.5 79-93
6.0 60-78
5.5 46-59
5.0 35-45
4.5 32-44
0-4 0-31
四項平均：總分除以四
IELTS Score TOEFL Score
9.0 30
8.5 29
8.0 28
7.5 27
7.0 24-26
6.5 20-23
6.0 12-19
5.5 7-11
5.0 4-6
4.5 3
<=4 0-2
雅思託福其他分數換算
雅思和託福聽力分數換算：
IELTS Score TOEFL iBT Score
9 -30
8.5 -29
8 -28
7.5 -27
7 24 - 26
6.5 20 - 23
6 12 - 19
5.5 7 - 11
5 4 - 6
4.5- 3
0-4 0 - 2
雅思和託福閱讀分數換算：
IELTS Score TOEFL iBT Score
9 30
8 - 8.5 -29
7.5- 27 - 28
7- 24 - 26
6.5- 19 - 23
6 13 - 18
5.5- 8 - 12
5 -4 - 7
4.5 3
0-4 0 - 2
雅思和託福口語分數換算：
IELTS Score TOEFL iBT Score
9 30
8.5 28 - 29
8 26 - 27
7.5 24 - 25
7 23
6.5 20 - 22
6 18 - 19
5.5 16 - 17
5 14 - 15
4.5 12 - 13
0-4 0 - 11
雅思寫作範文：體罰的利弊
Task：Many parents use punishment to teach the different between right and wrong to kids. Many think punishment is necessary to help children learn the distintion. What degree do you agree or disagree?
思路解析：
體罰的好處 :
1. 及時制止孩子的危險行爲。
2. 有效防止以後的類似行爲。
3. 傳達社會法則：做錯事就要受懲罰。
體罰的壞處：
1. 導致傷殘。
2. 導致家庭親情破裂。
3. 培養了暴力至上的錯誤價值觀。
參考範文：
When it comes to children education, parents usually expect too much for their children, and most of them let temper flare out of control by executing physical punishment to their children. Some people think this behavior it is necessary for children's self discipline and self reflection. However, others criticize it seriously because it is naturally violent. In my opinion, I am in favor of the latter view, and I will explore possible reasons as below.
On one hand, there are a lot of benefits of corporal punishment in moderation. Firstly, the threat of punishment gives children to think twice about the made up in their minds patterns of behavior whether the pattern is considered to be normal or deviant. Secondly, punishment disciplines children's hard-to-control ego. Keeping in mind so called "stick" restricts a child from being irresponsible and violent towards his/her family, friends, neighbors and just occasionally met people. Thirdly, punishment partially plays the part in creating a concept of respect in children. To be able to respect something, you have to learn how to love something and keep it safe. Being so carefree, children tend to forget to keep the toys safe or to put away the clothes or make the bed. The reminding of punishment is the first signal in their heads to fix the situations.
In spite of positive effect of punishment, negative ones always remain. Punishment is not the only and first means to teach children how to be a part of society. Side effect of the punishment can be low self-confidence in a child and consequently lack of motivation in studying, in having hobbies, in creating new games or activities. In many cases, this poor parenting skill can exert a bad impact on children by experience of serious reprocessing, with its evident contribution to children’s mental illness. Several studies showed that most frequent physical punishment with maltreatment maybe lead to depression, juvenile crimes and even suicide. What is more, Children might be afraid of the punishment so much that it prevents them from making new friends, sharing their ideas and being themselves after all.
In conclusion, I consider physical punishment should be applied in a very proper and cautious way, on which it can well correct children's misbehaviors and thoughts, as well as build up positive personalities like respectfulness, mindfulness and modesty. However, what its overuse come with is unacceptable, including child abuse, broken family ties, aggressive tempers and low self-esteem.
(408 words)
雅思寫作範文：快節奏社會的問題
Task：The speeding up of life in areas such as travel and communications is negatively affecting the society at every level --- individual, national, and global. Do you agree or disagree?
思路解析：
同意，快節奏的生活方式同時給個人，國家和全球帶來的負面影響。
1. 個人層面：生活的加速會增大人們的壓力，因爲它破壞了生活的平衡。舉例，飛機大大加速了人們的出行，但是也帶來了更高的工作預期和更緊湊的時間計劃。在太多例子中，企業員工被要求在早上乘坐飛機抵達另一個州，甚至是國家，來參加會議和談判，然後又搭乘午夜的航班飛回家，中間沒有任何的休息時間。結果是，人們會感覺筋疲力盡，喘不過氣。
2. 國際層面：快速的運輸和通訊系統的建立會進一步破壞環境。舉例，飛機的頻繁使用會排放大量的尾氣。同樣的，爲了滿足無線通訊的需求，如手機，數不清的基站被建立在山區和森林裏，這破壞了生態圈。
3. 國家層面：便利的旅遊和通訊會破壞一個國家的文化。舉例，飛機增強了國家之間的聯繫，如貿易和旅遊，但這也把國外文化引進到國內，這會導致文化競爭，並很有可能殺死本土文化。同樣的，互聯網的興旺也把人們暴露在一個全球的流行文化之下，如流行音樂，電影，遊戲，這讓年輕人失去對於本國文化的興趣。
參考範文：
Nowadays, modern technologies have sharply speeded up people’s traveling and communication. Some people argue that there are many negative results behind this fast-paced trend, personally, nationally, and globally. Personally, I strongly agree with this view, and my reasons will be explored as below.
Firstly, on the personal level, an accelerated life pace make individuals stressful, due to it breaks the balance between working and living. For example, airplanes, the fastest transportation nowadays, can largely shorten the time of people’s long-distant traveling, while its high efficiency also causes higher work expectancy and tighter work schedule. For example, in a single day, a manager of multi-national companies is asked to take plane to go for a meeting in another region and country far away in the morning, and fly back to the home at night. This fast and exhausting lifestyle not only damages people’s health, but also alienates them from families, because of the lack of time spent on exercise, rest, or dinners with spouse and children.
In addition, on the international level, fast systems of global transportation and communication worse the environment. For one thing, an increasing number of cross-border air flights mean more fossil oil is burned and more waste gas is emitted, such as smog. As a result, this kind of discharge further deteriorates the global warming. Similarly, for the purpose of building up a modern seamless communication system for cell phones and the Internet, new base stations are installed in mountains and forests, new cable ropes are buried under the seabed. These constructions make an overall destruction to the global ecosystem, thus leading to the extinction of species.
Finally, on the national level, the thriving of fast long-distant traveling and communication would destroy cultural identities of a country. For example, fast airplanes bring more foreigners to a region or a country for cross-border meetings and tours. In order to meet the needs and tastes of these new comers, local old buildings are replaced by modern skyscrapers, and traditional cuisines are replaced by western fast food like McDonald. What is more, advertisements and videos of a pop culture on the Internet, from Hollywood movies to rock music, from Paris fashions to online games, draw all attention of the public in any local area. In other words, under the influence of the Internet which plays a role of cultural invader, people will lose the interests and respects in their local culture.
In conclusion, adverse consequences of a fast-paced world are undeniable, including an unbalanced lifestyle, environmental problems caused by airplanes and telecommunication, and the disappearance of a local culture.
(435 words)
雅思寫作範文：父母是否該跟孩子們講故事
Task：Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children, while others think parents need not do that, as children can read books, watch TV or movies by themselves. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
思路解析：
1. 給孩子講故事好處多多。第一，這能鞏固家庭紐帶。舉例，在講故事的過程中，父母和孩子都會完全把注意力放到對方身上，進行深度的感情交流，這培養了他們之間的信任和相互關愛。
2. 第二，在聽故事的過程中，孩子們的記憶力，語言能力，詞彙量，以及把抽象信息視覺化的思維都會得到鍛鍊和提升，這對於他們今後的學術教育十分有用，比如說他們能在課堂上及時抓住老師講課的要點。
3. 當然，孩子自由閱讀或是觀看電視也是必要的。舉例，在獨立閱讀的過程中，他們需要進行獨立的思考和判斷，這讓他們變得思維成熟，而且自由閱讀各個領域的書籍也是一個實現自我認知的過程，讓他們找到自己擅長的，感興趣的專業方向。
參考範文：
It has been rightly said that ‘There have been great societies that did not use the wheel, but there have been no societies that did not tell stories.’ The question of debate is whether parents should read or tell stories to children or whether children should come to know about stories themselves by reading books or by watching TV or movies. In this essay I intend to discuss both views followed by my opinion.
There are many benefits of reading bedtime stories to children. First of all, it encourages family bonding. In this day and age of hectic lives and busy schedules, reading together is a simple and enjoyable way for parents to take time out and focus on the family. Children also feel wanted and loved. What is more, it moulds children into becoming readers, and this significantly increases the child’s potential for academic success as well as lifelong success in general. It also helps children master language development as by listening to stories, children learn pronunciation and vocabulary. It also builds listening skills, increases a child’s attention span, and develops the ability to concentrate. It develops children’s ability to express themselves more confidently, easily, and clearly in spoken and written terms. It develops and fosters a child’s natural curiosity.
Furthermore, it develops creativity and a child’s ability to use his own imagination. It expands children’s horizons by exposing them to new situations, and teaches them appropriate behavior. Reading children’s stories to children provides the best opportunities for true teaching moments as most of these stories have morals. Reading picture books develops a young child’s appreciation for the arts through exposure to many different styles of art and illustrations.
On the other hand, some opine that children should themselves read stories from books or watch them on TV and in movies. When reading books and news on TV by themselves rather than by depending on parents, children have the freedom of making decisions and judgments, thus sharpening the ability of independent thinking. What is more, it is mainly freely reading books, magazines and TV programs in a diversity of subjects, from science to arts to sports that builds up the self-discovery for children, for example, figuring out what subjects and future careers might be suitable for their potentials, talents and interests.
This would be much easier for the parents who are too busy nowadays, but then all the above benefits would not ensue. What is more, parents can start telling stories to children much before children can themselves read. Watching TV does not help the child to develop imagination and this may be detrimental in the long run. Moreover, it would be difficult to monitor what children are actually learning.
To sum up, I believe that, it is always better for the parents as well as the children, if parents read aloud to their children. This would give them quality time together and loads of other benefits which I have discussed above. I pen off with a famous quote of Robert Mackee “Stories are the creative conversion of life itself into a more powerful, clearer, more meaningful experience. They are the currency of human contact.”
(546 words)
