雅思寫作法律犯罪類題目解析

　 　雅思寫作遇到法律犯罪類的題目該怎麼解答，下面小編給大家整理了該題目的解析大全，希望對你們有所幫助。

雅思寫作典型法律犯罪題目講解

A類的雅思大作文大致可以分爲教育，社會，科技，政府政策，大衆媒體，法律和犯罪這麼六大類的題目，而其中學生們普遍反映最怵的，感覺最無從下手的題目當屬法律與犯罪類型的題目。截至到08年12月22日爲止，在1月12日，8月16日以及10月11日的考試均出現了法律，犯罪的題目。雖然說出題頻率相對來說並不是非常的頻繁，但是如果學生在備考中沒有進行合理有效的對此類話題具有針對性的總結和複習的話，相信很難在寫作中取得什麼理想的分數(參加了這幾次考試中的學員的分數普遍不是非常的理想)。而縱觀市面上大量的雅思寫作指導，烤鴨備考祕笈這些針對不同層次，不同水平的學生而編輯的雅思叢書中，我們也很難看到針對犯罪這類題目的一些教學及複習指導。在此篇論文中，我將就法律與犯罪所涉及的一些常見話題給大家從其內容，語言逐一進行分析，希望雅思教師們或者烤鴨們能夠從中受益。

1. Can capital punishment (death penalty) ever be justified?

是否應該有死刑?

這個題目可以說是一談到法律犯罪這一大類話題時，最會經常談到的問題。對於大多數中國雅思考生，尤其是高中生，大學生，如果沒有事先經過精心準備的話，對這個題目恐怕只能是傻眼了。關於這個話題，大致可以分成以下這幾個分論點來展開：

Arguments against capital punishment

1. 死刑只是對罪犯的一種處罰，而並不能夠將犯罪行爲中受害者生命挽回，或者賠償其所遭受的傷害

Capital punishment, which even though manages to bring the criminals to justice, could by no means compensate for physical, mental and psychological sufferings inflicted on victims, or in some extreme cases, bring back their lives.

2. 無論一個人犯多大的錯誤，其他人都無權剝奪其生命。 (人權)

It is entirely unjustified to deprive one of his/her rights to live regardless of how insanely severe and cruel the offenses he/she has committed are. (This subject matter has boiled to the controversial issue of human rights)

3. 死刑犯的屍體的處理(是否可以用於器官移植等等)將是一個非常具有爭議的道德問題。

How the body of the deceased criminal is going to be disposed of (used for organ transplant, for instance) will be bound to raise grave both ethical and social implications.

Arguments for capital punishment

1. 如果死刑犯沒有受到最爲嚴厲的懲罰，那麼這對受害者是不公平的。

It would be only fair for the victims if the criminals are subject to the greatest fear of all- death.

2. 如果死刑取消的話，那麼很多潛在的罪犯就不會顧忌做出一些極爲可怕的犯罪行爲。

If capital punishment is ever to be done away with, the potential wrong-doers wouldn’t be deterred from committing staggeringly serious offenses among which serial murder proves particularly appalling.

2. Should criminals be sent to prisons or placed on education and job retraining?

類似的題目之前曾經考過，而在今年的1月12日再次出現。對於這個題目，很多學生會非常容易的陷入一個陷阱(pitfall)，那就是認爲說如果讓學生接受教育或就業培訓的話，那就是等同於有充分的人身自由了。其實不然，這裏的教育或就業培訓並不代表說把囚犯與普通的學生或接受培訓者一樣等同的對待，而是一樣的要限制他們的自由，只不過說不像在監獄裏整天關在牢房裏無所事事，而是要接受教育和培訓。關於這個題目，其實就變成了一個兩者之間的對比，可以從以下幾個方面進行論述。

1. 監獄同教育或就業培訓相比有很強的阻嚇作用，這樣可以有效的抑制犯罪率的上升。

In stark contrast to placing criminals on educational courses or employment retraining, prisons appeared more effective in deterring potential, would-be wrongdoers from committing crimes, thus drastically decreasing the likelihood of rising crime rate.

2. 監獄更多的對罪犯來說是一種懲罰，因此能夠避免再犯。

Being locked up behind the bars is a punitive measure imposed on criminals who are highly unlikely to turn into a recidivist in consideration of their fear of setting foot into jails ever again.

Arguments for education and job retraining

1. 罪犯在監獄裏所被包圍的是一羣囚犯，這對罪犯的改造不是好的，反而是不好的影響。接受教育可以讓罪犯在一個積極的環境裏，真正的意識到對與錯。

“Captivity of negativity” is a terminology intended to describe the destructive, rather than constructive impact on criminals who are locked up in prison, surrounded by people who probably have committed even more serious charges. Education serves to correct any misconception or eliminate twisted thoughts they have by immersing them in a positive environment.

2. 大多數罪犯往往是沒有什麼文化知識和生存技能，出獄後通常很難找到工作。教育和就業培訓能夠讓他們在日後的生活中靠自己生存下去，而不至於因爲沒有收入來源而再次誤入歧途。

A significant proportion of criminals are sadly illiterate without adequate fundamental knowledge and survival skills and it wouldn’t be easy for them to find a decent job after being released from the jail. With convenient access to education and job retraining, they are able to survive by themselves, greatly reducing the chance of becoming a recidivist in times when they are financially challenged.

3. Should individual choices interfere with the society that is based on rules and laws

這是今年10月11號的考題，這道題目主要討論的核心是一種矛盾。那就是社會始終是以法規和法律爲基礎的，而有時社會的利益往往是與個人的選擇相矛盾的。當這種矛盾發生時，應該將哪一個放在首位?爲什麼?這次考試結束後，我曾經與幾個參與考試的學生討論過，很多學生的反映就是這個題目其實並不難，但就是不知道怎樣下手。還有某位學生直接就舉了一個我們不能隨便殺人，因爲這是違反法律的事情的這樣一個例子。其實，這個題目最爲關鍵的是兩點：怎樣去法律的範圍還有就是要找到一個合適法律與個人選擇發生衝突的這麼一個結合點。我對這個題目的段落結構以及內容的理解如下：

1.這種矛盾的產生主要是因爲法律法規是從大衆和國家的利益出發，而個人利益則絕大多數情況下是站在個人角度考慮問題的。一個有利於個人的問題如果給其他人造成了無謂的傷害，則是不應該允許的。

The conflict of public interest and personal interest accounts largely for the issue of the extent to which is the interference of personal choices justified with the society governed by rules and laws.

這裏我們可以舉一個例子，就知識產權(Intellectual Property Rights).很多人都會去網絡上下載免費電影，音樂以及電子書。這樣做的原因就是正版(authentic copy)相對中國消費者來說太貴。雖然說這看起來合情合理，大多數人都會從中受益，但是這也同時傷害到了娛樂明星們(celebrities)和唱片公司的利益，所以這時候應該以法律爲根本，杜絕這種行爲。

2.反過來說，我們不可否認個別特別情況下法律也應該給正當的個人選擇讓步

On the other hand, rules and laws should give in to personal choices in some special cases.

比如說，開車送心臟病突然發作的人趕往醫院。儘管說途中司機可能會闖紅燈(run red lights，會造成一定的交通混亂，甚至說還有發生交通事故的可能。但是這樣一種行爲我認爲應該被理解(tolerated). 這是出於法律之外的，但是又合乎情理的。當然，這種法律的讓步是有限的，很多時候確實很難判斷。所以，無論是法律還是個人選擇，最終都是從應該是整體的利益出發.

以上就是我對三個比較典型的法律犯罪類的題目的講解，希望能夠幫助到在緊張備考雅思的考生們。

　　雅思大作文解析及範文：社會法律規範是否該遵守

Task:Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

思路解析：

應該遵守：法律和法規是社會有序運行的前提，它們規範了人們的行爲和思想，讓人們的活動能限制在一個安全的，合法的範圍。相反，一旦人們恣意妄爲地來忽略這些法律的話，整個社會會陷入混亂。舉例，如果交通法規不被遵守，則會出現大量的車禍。如果刑法不被遵守的話，則會出現大量的社會犯罪。

不應該遵守：對於那些不公正的法律，人們應該被授予足夠的自由來進行對抗。舉例，如果美國今天仍然保留着奴隸法案的話，則今天的美國黑人將處境悲慘，沒有教育，醫療，工作和投票的權利。可以看到，這樣的法律必將引發來自黑人的憤怒，反抗，甚至是戰爭。

參考範文：

Nowadays, there is an assertion that the freedom of citizens should be limited; otherwise it might harm the social laws and justice system, thus making our society unstable. Personally, this view is psychologically right, while it overlooks the importance of fighting against the unfair laws freely.

Firstly, there is no doubt that obeying social rules and laws is the fundamental obligation for all individuals, for the reason that they serve as a key function of ensuring our society running on the right track. Obviously, these regulations define the borders between the right and the wrong, the social ethics and day-to-day conduct standards, all of which can instruct and regulate citizens to act and think in a lawful, polite and safe way. Otherwise, the ignorance of these regulations, or so-called “an absolute freedom”, will trap our society into chaos and even malfunction. For example, if the traffic laws were disrespected, it is expected that all streets and highways will be full of congestions and car crashes caused by wrongdoings in driving like blind over speed or overtaking. Similarly, if the criminal law were absent, then there will be no concern of punishments for committing crimes. Consequently, illegal activities including thefts, robberies, arson, rapes, vandalism and murders will be overwhelming, which will not only place the poverties and lives of the public in the danger, but also destroy today’s civilization in a long term.

However, there is always a justification that people should be allowed to freely question and topple those unfair laws that are the barriers of democracy development. In history, the typical example is the slavery law in America that defined African-Americans as second-class citizens and deprived their rights of public education, health care and vote. If this evil law were just followed, instead of being eradicated through the pursuit of human freedom, we now can predict clearly that current the community of America would be still full of inequity, discrimination, and massive social disorder caused by conflicts between the black and white.

All in all, I agree that it is very necessary to limit the freedom of the public by confining their behaviors in the bounds of social regulation and laws, which is the pre-condition of social democracy and stability. However, when it comes to unjust laws, the public should have the freedom to eliminate them.

(392 words)

雅思寫作重點題目總結：犯罪與法律類

1. 青少年犯罪

母題：In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this case happening? How should children or teenagers be punished? (100804)

提示：青少年犯罪juvenile delinquency 產生的原因及其解決方法。可從家庭、社會、媒體三個角度分析。

子題：很多年輕人有一種反社會行爲，原因是什麼，如何解決?犯罪是人類本性，還是可以預防的?

2. 犯罪預防

母題：Unlike in most other countries, police in the UK do not commonly carry guns. Some people think it leaves citizens unprotected. But others think it reduces the overall violence in our society. Discuss both sides of the view and give your opinion. (040320, 040619)

提示：這道題目當之無愧地成爲母題，因爲這道話題自從2010年9月起已經成爲了雅思口語話題中的題目。11年8月20日，這道題目以變題的形式再一次出現在雅思寫作中。

子題：是否應該嚴懲違反交規者?城市中採取預防犯罪的措施，利大於弊嗎?個人如果爲所欲爲，社會就無法運轉，你同意嗎?犯罪是世界問題，無法預防，你同意嗎?

3. 罪犯懲處

母題：Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? (050618, 080918)

提示：其實囚禁imprisonment和再教育都是一種讓囚犯改造rehabilitate的方法。還有community service對於輕犯和初犯都是一種不錯的懲處方式。

子題：監獄除了懲罰犯罪，還有什麼功能?降低犯罪的最佳方法是延長監獄星期嗎?刑滿釋放人員再犯罪率很高，爲什麼，如何解決?你認爲罪犯應該送到監獄還是應該做一些社區工作或學習一些技能?

雅思寫作高難詞彙整理：法律專集

犯罪/違反法律:commit a crime , break the law,

law breaking, violate the law, against the law,

罪犯: criminal, law offender, law breaker,

law violator, villain, vermin, convict

守法: abide by the law, comply, compliance with the law,

conform. to the law, abidance by law, keep the law

濫用法律: abuse of law, stretch the law

監獄/關押:jail, prison, imprisonment, imprison, incarcerate, lock up

死刑: capital punishment, death penalty, death sentence

無期徒刑: life sentence, life prisonment, lifelong punishment

受害者: victim, casualty

無辜的: innocent, harmless

改造: rehabilitate

威懾力: deterrent

逮捕: arrest, apprehend

武裝搶劫: armed robbery ; 縱火: arson;

敲詐勒索: blackmail; 販賣 違禁品: bootlegging;

非法闖入: break-in; 行賄受賄:bribery;

竊聽: bug; 入室盜竊: burglary;

職業罪犯: career criminal; 虐待兒童: child abuse;

僞造: counterfeit; 強姦犯:rapist;

賭博: gamble; 劫持: hijack;

集團犯罪:organized crime; 扒手: pickpocket;

色情商店: pornoshop; 逃稅: tax evasion;

仁慈的: lenient, merciful;

開明的: enlightened,

文明的: civilized,

仁慈的: humane

和諧的: harmonious

同情的的: sympathetic

殘忍的: cruel, brutal, merciless, inhumane, dispiteous