雅思寫作推薦好用書籍
一般在備考雅思寫作時會用到2大類的資料，一類鞏固基礎帶講解型的書，教你雅思寫作的基本詞彙和寫作的方法，思路。另一類是雅思寫作的範文和句型之類的資料，這些資料重在爲我們的作文添光加彩。下面看看具體內容!
雅思寫作書籍推薦
1.9分雅思寫作--經典範文70篇
《9分雅思寫作：經典範文70篇》主要內容包括：議論文70篇、雅思考試真題、新穎的創新手法、獨特的寫作思路等，全面記錄了老師在課堂上總結的有效方法和精闢例文。
2.雅思寫作官方題庫速背精選
本書是一本精簡，易於背誦，話題高頻而精華，範文典型且易於背誦，點評權威而直擊要害，體例清晰，針對性強爲一體的寫作書。話題考頻高，範文經典，講解獨特。特別適合備考時間短，構建文章能力差，語法錯誤連篇，複習抓不到要點，又要取得高分的考生。
3.最新版雅思寫作官方題庫範文大全
本書中收錄262篇雅思考官審定的高分範文，囊括亞太、歐美考區全部官方真題，精心分類雅思寫作官方題目。書中所列舉的題目幾乎包括了目前雅思寫作官方題庫的所有題目。寫作題目分類精細，範文典型且附有準確譯文。這本書對於將要備考雅思寫作的廣大考生們而言，是一本難得的適宜背誦的複習參考書。
4.雅思寫作速背360
本書中的寫作句式附有例句，詞彙，附錄內有範文，以便於讀者理解使用，部分句式的填入部分還提供了萬能選填內容以備低水平考生選擇。全篇句式組合提供的不僅僅是模板，它實際上是高分句式和讀者個人獨特思路的結合，讓考生能夠在掌握模板的同時，達到靈活的運用的目的，以拓展考生的思路，幫助考生寫出自己獨特的高分作文。
5.雅思真題高頻詞彙-寫作
本套叢書是繼《80天攻克雅思》叢書之後，又一套雅思系列圖書。緊扣考試，簡明實用，針對性極強。其中《雅思真題高頻詞彙寫作》分冊收錄了高頻詞彙和8分詞彙兩部分，其中高頻詞彙又按詞性分爲：名詞、動詞、形容詞、副詞、短語、連詞、介詞和代詞等8部分，每個單詞都配有例句，不同於市面上僅僅簡單羅列單詞的雅思詞彙書，更加詳細具體。根據雅思考試常考同義詞辨析的特點，在具體講解每個單詞的時候，加入了：<參見某詞>的同義詞辨析項，幫助讀者比較性的記憶。
6.模擬考官點評雅思寫作
誰都知道劍橋真題上的考官文章均爲滿分作文，可是中國考生一般難以理解爲何考官要那樣寫，其所附上的考生文章配有考官評語，本來這些都是最權威、最實戰的考試信息，無奈由於思維方式的不同導致中國考生無法理解其精髓所在。筆者利用在考試中心工作六年的便利條件，自己先搞懂西方人的思維方式，然後結合中國的文化背景，整理出適合中國考生的答題思路。比如說，每道題的答題觀點是符合考官思維的，而舉證是來自於大家自身的學習、工作和生活環境。此書絕大多數內容均爲在實踐中驗證過對錯的。換句話來說，大多數觀點和內容是已經經過考生在真正的考試中證明錯對的，而不是簡單地由作者主觀認爲錯對的，所以該書應該是目前市面上所有關於雅思寫作大作文最具實戰性和指導性的教材和學習研究的材料。
7.考雅老師講新題-綜合寫作
本書從切實提高讀者英語寫作水平、獲得高分作文的立場出發，以2003年後出現的雅思考試寫作新題爲素材，按留學、移民兩大類寫作的話題組織而成。每一類涵蓋若干高頻話題，引導讀者快速破題，立意，寫提綱，組織論證。分析一針見血，範文精悍流暢。每篇範文都由雅思作文老師親自寫作，精心打造，力求地道。堪稱本書最大看點!英文的獨特表達、經典句型和高分詞彙均在範文中清晰標註，並配以必要註解。默誦強記，用於自己作文中，衝刺雅思寫作高分!
8.雅思寫作7+範文
對於IELTS寫作來說，《雅思7+範文》意思着精華與集粹。該書緊密跟蹤最新考試規律和動態，匯聚了根據歷年寫作真題的經典範文，對於廣大考生準確把握考題趨勢、迅速提高寫作技巧，提供了有力的支持。
雅思寫作資料推薦
(1)54篇圖表作文高分範文
(2)Simon寫作電子書-Ideas for IELTS topics(強烈推薦)
(3)雅思寫作100句單句練習(必練)
(4)2016年雅思考試大作文範文合集
(5)2017年雅思考試真題9分範文合集 (強烈推薦)
(6)Simon考官9分作文範文合集
(7)雅思A類大作文8大題材
(8)雅思A類小作文7類題型高分範文庫(強烈推薦)
(9)雅思寫作精選語料庫
雅思範文：城鄉醫療教育的選擇
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. But some others think everyone should be free to choose where they work uss and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, it can be generally observed that the disparity between cities and the country has been aggravated by relentless urbanization. With respect to educational and medical facilities, a yawning gap has emerged between those in cities and the rural ones. This manifest chasm has prompted some to suggest that teachers and doctors fresh out of university work in the country for a few many are opposed to this view on the grounds that it infringes upon individual freedom to choose where they onally, I think both these two views have merit and demerit.
Granted,assigning new teachers and doctors to the countryside may create certain begin with,this practice can help foster a strong sense of obligation in many teachers and can experience first-hand how the rural residents are held back by the out-moded teaching and medical facilities and this, in turn, can inspire a host of professionals to commit themselves to the alleviation of this disturbing situation. Moreover,the inferior living and working conditions in the country can temper many of these young professionals’ are very likely to be more tenacious and determined and hence more successful than their urban counterparts in later careers.
However,there are even more drawbacks that this practice can the first place,many young teachers and doctors will feel unmotivated or frustrated if they are sent to rural areas against their own may have a hard time getting accustomed to the shabby housing and primitive facilities and slack off at the second place,if new teachers and doctors are coerced to work in the countryside, a considerable proportion of them may find it daunting when it comes time for them to relocate to cities after a few years in the will feel intense occupational stress when they cannot operate efficiently equipment much more advanced than the devices they are used to back in the country school or hospital. Last but not least, given the inferiority of the rural educational and medical facilities,it is highly probable that the inexperience of new teachers and doctors will lead to unsatisfactory job performance in rural schools and really cannot expect fresh recruits to work wonders with outdated tools.
In the final analysis,I concede that sending teachers and doctors fresh out of college to the countryside may produce specific advantages. However,if we enforce this indiscriminately,that will surely generate even more banes. On balance, I am convinced we should optimize our workforce and honor the individual freedom in determining where they work.
雅思範文：是否該鼓勵年老員工退休
Companies should encourage old employees (55 years old) to retire, in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, plenty of employees who are more than 55 years old must retire because of company policy; therefore, many people think that the development of a company cannot be separated from the number of young employees. The above point is certainly true; this essay will outline three reasons.
The main reason is that plenty of young employees mean that the company is infused with lots of young blood. With the development of technology, more and more new technological products have been developed. The new generation masters advanced technology and have the energy to exploit. They have learned lots of knowledge in the university; therefore it is definitely useful for the development of companies. Another reason is that old employees cannot adapt themselves to the rapid pace. Old employees find it difficult to learn new things rapidly. With their limited physical strength, they are not capable of heavy manual work. So old employees are not a patch on young employees, it means not only intellect but also physical strength.
Last but not the least reason is that old employees have already worked for more than half of their lifetime, so they should retire to enjoy life. The old employees have already paid out too much in order to look after their families and careers. So they should pursue their hobbies
In conclusion, old employees shouldn’t continue working for themselves. Moreover, advancement of society needs a new generation.
雅思寫作：機器翻譯與學習外語
Some people think that machine translation is highly developed in today’s society. Therefore it is not necessary for children to learn a foreign language. What’s your opinion?
With the rapid development of modern science, computers have been playing a more important role in our daily lives. It is such a worldwide trend that there is no exception for Chinese.
Many people regard the computer as the magic machine. It can solve many problems quickly and efficiently, and best of all, it can translate all kinds of languages. By using the computer you can just put ail the original versions into it and then you will get the fast translation. So some parents raise doubts about the necessity for their children to learn foreign languages so hard any more.
At first thought, it seems that the computers can really help us to do so. But if you look in- sue the matter deeply, you may find a different answer. First of all, machines can never replace mankind. Computers are created by man and are controlled by human brains. We can never rely too much on machines; otherwise we will become the slave of them one day. On the contrary, we need to enrich our knowledge as much as possible so that we can catch up with the fast pace of the world. It is very necessary to learn more languages so as to upgrade our abilities to follow the progress of the world.
And furthermore, it will do good to children if they learn more languages. Both their brain and their thinking modules can benefit from it. When they grow up, they can easily accept various kinds of cultures and communicate with foreigners, which can favorably enhance the mutual understanding and develop international brotherhood.
So, we can clearly see that, though computers can be good translators, people still need to learn more languages with a view to improving their abilities and facilitating their future communication with people from other cultures.
An argument occasionally these days is that some people often think machine translation can take place of the children's study of a foreign language. As far as I am concerned, I can't totally agree with this opinion.
It first comes to the point that machine translation is not high efficiency. The human language is so complex that nowadays no such machine can translate one language to another sufficiently and totally. The machine can only provide some words or pieces of half-baked sentences. So we human beings, especially children, may not rely on this kind of machine, at least recently.
On the other hand, if the real machine that the whole sentence can be translated completely turn to reality, children should not be taught not study a foreign language. The reason is the language (especially speaking) is made up of not only the grammar and words but also tones and mood. And when children are studying a language, he is not discovering an unknown area, but wild his logic and ideation. Additionally, even if the machine will be out of work one day occasionally in future, he can talk with other foreigners freely.
Frankly, the loss of language sensitivity is much popular these days. Many people's speaking and grammar is terrible. Children often study wrong speaking from annoying TV programs and untrained broadcasters. The invention of translation machine will make it worse. The problem whether to teach the boys and girls foreign languages or not needs to be treated seriously.
In a word, in modern society the translation machine is stealing our sensitivity of the language. People should do something to prevent the loss of language ability, especially in the childhood.
雅思寫作書籍推薦
